The use of growth models in forest planning: the tree that hides the forest

April 30, 2026|10:30 AM ET

Canada's forest managers face mounting pressure to recalibrate allowable timber harvests as outdated growth models fail to account for accelerated climate impacts, risking overharvesting or economic shortfalls in provinces dependent on forestry.

Key takeaways

  • Recent federal and provincial reports highlight the urgent need to integrate climate factors into forest growth models, as traditional models underestimate changes in tree growth rates driven by warming temperatures, droughts, and pests.
  • Inaccurate growth projections directly affect sustainable harvest levels, with provinces adjusting allowable cuts to protect ecosystems and meet carbon goals, potentially costing jobs and revenue in rural communities reliant on timber.
  • Tensions arise between short-term economic needs and long-term adaptation, where over-reliance on old models could lead to ecological decline or missed opportunities for carbon sequestration credits.

Climate Pressures on Forest Models

Forest growth models form the backbone of Canada's sustainable forest management, providing projections of tree volume accumulation used to set annual allowable cuts across vast public lands. These models underpin decisions on how much timber can be harvested without depleting future supplies or harming biodiversity.

Climate change has introduced rapid shifts that traditional empirical models struggle to capture. Rising temperatures, altered precipitation, increased wildfire frequency, and insect outbreaks like mountain pine beetle have altered growth rates, mortality, and regeneration patterns in boreal and temperate forests. Provincial inventories now incorporate ongoing research to update models with climate-sensitive parameters, but gaps persist in representing regeneration dynamics after disturbances.

The stakes are concrete and immediate. In 2024-2025 reports, Natural Resources Canada noted investments exceeding $800 million in wildfire resilience amid escalating disturbances that reduce productive forest area. Overharvesting based on optimistic growth assumptions could accelerate carbon emissions from forests, undermining Canada's climate commitments, while conservative adjustments might constrain timber supply for industries employing tens of thousands in rural areas.

Non-obvious tensions include the trade-off between precision in individual stand predictions and landscape-level reliability—focusing too narrowly on tree-level growth risks missing broader ecosystem shifts. Provinces like British Columbia and Ontario have revised planning manuals and yield tables to address these, yet debates continue over balancing timber production against carbon storage values, especially as old-growth protections and Indigenous co-management gain prominence. Economic analyses suggest protecting certain intact forests could yield billions in societal benefits from carbon and other services, challenging conventional logging economics.

We use cookies to measure site usage. Privacy Policy