FREE UKSG webinar: Why we all need to #DefendResearch

Censorship in U.S. Research

Since January 2025, the U.S. administration has enacted policies that limit research on topics deemed politically sensitive, including diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), gender studies, environmental science, and public health. Actions include banning certain terms in grant proposals, removing datasets from government websites, restricting international partnerships, and pressuring federally funded publications to align with ideological priorities.

These measures build on earlier state-level restrictions but represent an unprecedented federal escalation. The Declaration to Defend Research Against U.S. Government Censorship, released in February 2025 by scholars and publishers including Lisa Schiff, Peter Suber, and others, has garnered over 2,000 signatures from individuals and organizations worldwide. It condemns suppression of research and calls for resistance to preserve academic freedom.

The stakes are immediate and severe. Funding losses have halted projects, forced retractions, and deterred work on controversial topics, creating self-censorship among researchers fearing career damage. U.S. competitiveness in science and technology faces long-term erosion, with economic consequences estimated in billions through reduced innovation. Globally, collaborative efforts — from HIV research in South Africa to climate studies in Australia — have suffered cancellations or cuts due to U.S. aid pauses or vetting requirements.

Tensions arise between defending open inquiry and navigating government pressure. Some institutions preemptively avoid sensitive subjects to protect funding, while others sign declarations or archive data independently. Publishers face trade-offs: complying risks complicity in distortion, resisting invites retaliation but upholds core values. The campaign highlights how U.S.-centric actions undermine a globally interdependent knowledge ecosystem, where one nation's censorship diminishes shared progress for all.