Claims Outlook 2026: trends, coverage fault lines, and emerging risks for brokers and underwriters
Liability claims costs are surging as social inflation drives nuclear jury awards and psychiatric injury litigation spikes, forcing brokers and underwriters to rethink coverage adequacy just as new environmental risks like forever chemicals threaten massive uncovered losses.
Key takeaways
- •Persistent claims inflation and heightened litigation over psychiatric injuries and worker-to-worker incidents in 2025 have eroded underwriting margins in liability portfolios, creating urgent pressure for repricing and tighter terms in 2026.
- •Emerging risks from forever chemicals (PFAS) are generating product and environmental liability claims that expose fault lines in standard policies, potentially leading to billions in uninsured losses amid tightening reinsurance.
- •Brokers and underwriters face a tension between competitive pricing in a softening market and the need for disciplined risk selection to avoid amplified losses from social inflation and catastrophe volatility.
Liability Claims Under Pressure
Australian liability portfolios absorbed significant strain in 2025 from unrelenting claims inflation and a rise in litigation, particularly around psychiatric injury claims and worker-to-worker incidents. These trends accelerated costs beyond expectations, squeezing profitability for insurers and prompting a reevaluation of coverage scopes as 2026 approaches.
Globally, similar dynamics are at play in casualty lines. Social inflation—marked by expanding liability definitions, aggressive plaintiff litigation, and outsized jury awards—has driven severity higher, even as some property lines see rate softening. In the US, casualty sectors grapple with nuclear verdicts and venue-specific risks, contributing to combined ratios that remain vulnerable despite overall P&C stability.
A non-obvious tension lies in emerging contaminants like PFAS, which trigger product liability, environmental cleanup, and class-action exposures not always contemplated in legacy policies. These forever chemicals, found in everything from firefighting foam to consumer goods, create long-tail risks that could dwarf traditional claims if coverage disputes proliferate.
The stakes are concrete: inadequate adjustments risk amplified loss ratios, with reinsurance capacity pulling back on high-severity exposures. Insurers already face a global protection gap nearing US$183 billion, exacerbated by catastrophe losses—California wildfires alone cost an estimated $40 billion in 2025—and tariff-driven inflation in repair costs. For brokers and underwriters, inaction means eroded margins or coverage gaps that leave clients exposed, while over-correction could cede market share in a period of increased competition.
Trade-offs abound. A softening market tempts aggressive pricing to capture volume, yet unchecked social inflation and volatile catastrophes demand caution. Regulatory scrutiny adds another layer, with evolving standards on climate and cyber risks forcing more transparent risk assessments.
Sources
- https://events.teams.microsoft.com/event/54c9368e-b80f-469c-aa5d-9495551247d2@6d96f8f2-00e8-4ea1-9ba7-fd86f83ec1b3
- https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/financial-services/financial-services-industry-outlooks/insurance-industry-outlook.html
- https://www.markel.com/insights-and-resources/insights/top-10-insurance-trends-for-2026
- https://www.amwins.com/resources-and-insights/market-insights/article/state-of-the-market-2026-outlook
- https://www.gclegal.com.au/insights/insurance-claims-trends-for-2026